Climate Change, Adapting to Drought as an Emerging Critical ESG Risk in Western Australia
No doubt you have observed the widespread browning of vegetation across Western Australia (WA) following record temperatures in February 2024. Perhaps you have also read about the ecosystem collapse reported in 2010 and 2011? Apparently, the first forest collapse possibly in the world, occurred thirteen to fourteen years ago in WA (Western Australia’s catastrophic forest collapse).
Ecosystem collapse is when ecosystems alter significantly from their originally state leading to species and habitat loss, reduced vegetation cover and are unlikely t recover (University Wollongong – Environmental State of Play – March 2021).
So why is this important for Environmental and Social Governance (ESG) and sustainability reporting and compliance performance? Firstly, it is the collective efforts of many that will make the difference so we should not ignore this. We also know that events like this will increase in duration and frequency meaning that current baseline information, which is the basis of most of impact assessments is likely to exclude data that reflect ecosystem collapse scenarios. Consider this an opportunity.
By the law of averages, there will be many instances where the baseline data will rapidly be superseded, and the range of metrics and targets assigned to evaluate ecological performance for sustainability reporting in the current day will require adjustment. This in turn, will influence regulatory compliance performance and the ability to meet commitments, objectives and targets which could now be on the optimistic side of the range in values rather than realistic.
For those interested, the map below by the Bureau of Meteorology in their ‘Drought Statement’ for June 2024 illustrates soil moisture as the lowest on record in many parts of Western Australia (WA) (Drought Statement (bom.gov.au)). That is, the lowest for more than 100 years.

Small adjustments in your monitoring program to capture this unprecedented drought is worth considering. If you operate in any of the areas highlighted, pink and red, a brief re-analysis of your basis line data with re-assessments of the corresponding metrics and targets will be worthwhile. This may lead you to re-evaluate risks and opportunities and consider adjustments to your sustainable development objectives. In essence, more intensive environmental management will be needed with fewer guarantees and where we have left nature to care for itself, we now need to innovate to augment and deliver solutions that support nature and sustain the key values.
Below is a basic framework for undertaking this process. It’s adapted from the Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Framework.

Risk examples
- Climate change
- Biodiversity
- Carbon offsets
- Water
- Emissions
- Mine rehabilitation
- Heritage and culture
- Regulatory compliance
For our clients with mining operations in the Midwest and Goldfield regions in WA, we briefly considered the environmental factors vulnerable to ecosystems collapse. These included: biodiversity, emissions, water and Aboriginal landscape culture and heritage (DMP’s Environmental Policy – four factors). The components within in these factors were biodiversity offsets, carbon offsets, fugitive dust emissions, GHG emissions, riparian vegetation and health, vegetation condition, invasive plant species, mine closure and rehabilitation.
If you are interested in board advisory or environmental management support, message us here or send us an email at info@rescology.com.

GRI Revises Climate Change and Energy Standards to Improve Transparency
In November 2023, the GRI launched a draft review of the Climate Change and Energy Standards for consultation. The intent was to support the Sustainability Reporting Landscape, to align standards amidst the rapidly evolving global approach and the expectations of stakeholders as well as the requirements of the IFRS Disclosure Sustainability Standards. Standards under review include GRI 302: Energy 2016, GRI 305: Emissions 2016, Economic Performance including Disclosures, Financial Implications, Risks and Opportunities) (GRI, 2024). Six new GRI Topic Standards for the Climate Change Standard and one new GRI Topic Standards for the Energy Standard were introduced. Approval of the draft exposure standards is between Q4 2024 and Q1 2025. GRI encourage organisations to adapt early prior to the standards effective date (GRI, 2021).
If you’re looking to start your GRI reporting journey, you’ve come to the right place! Contact us today about evaluating your organisations impact or – visit our contacts page to get in touch!
#SustainabilityReporting, #GRI #Impact, #Environment, #People, #GRI, #MaterialTopics, #StakeholderEngagement #valuecreation, #resources, #minerals #energy #criticalminerals #transprency #Climate #Emissions #Energy #ClimateChange #Materialtopics #Goverance #Compliance&Risk #ESG